Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAN Cube

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to Draft namespace. TigerShark (talk) 23:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

=[[:GAN Cube]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=GAN Cube}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=GAN Cube}})

Previously moved to draft. Returned to main space without any sources. Only source I can find is a passing mention in Guardian, which says what sponsored cube the interview subject used. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP and is basically a product catalog. Slywriter (talk) 03:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions. Slywriter (talk) 03:44, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete – although well known among cube enthusiasts, doesn't nearly pass NCORP. The article also smells of an advertisement. Ovinus (talk) 05:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC) Draftify per below arguments and editor request; {{Ping|RoakleyTheBirb}} thanks for taking the time to work on it. Ovinus (talk) 22:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Keep - This article is not for advertisement purposes, and I intend on putting more information in. I am doing it ‘bit by bit’ , with the help of other people. Could an alternative solution be moving back to Draft, until I add more Information? Again no advertisement was intended, and I am trying to add more to the article, but have just been busy with exams and that. The reason why I moved it from draft is because I thought there was enough Information, but didn’t think of sources. So I am hoping that we can move it back to Drafts and I can continue working on it, and add sources. Thanks! RoakleyTheBirb (talk) 07:56, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Redirect to speed cubing, although I'm still not sure what that is. Oaktree b (talk) 16:54, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
  • :Speedcubing? From what I can see, it's solving Rubik's cubes and other similar "cubes" as fast as possible. Alpha Piscis Austrini (talk) 15:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Draftify as WP:ATD and per request by {{u|RoakleyTheBirb}} above. As it is there aren't enough references to meet WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 14:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Delete, redirect or draftify? Right now, there is no consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:17, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

:*Second !vote Hi {{u|RoakleyTheBirb}} you've currently !voted twice at this AfD. You should strike like this one of your !votes so that it is clear to the closer what your intentions are. HighKing++ 13:14, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: per first relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

  • Comment Move article to draft, redirect to Speedcubing seems sensible. (Nominator). Slywriter (talk) 02:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.