Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GB Innomech

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

=[[:GB Innomech]]=

:{{la|GB Innomech}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GB_Innomech Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|GB Innomech}})

non-notable for encyclopedic standards. brochure! Light2021 (talk) 21:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Delete Article is a puff piece, even if it has a few sources listed.TH1980 (talk) 01:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete Mentioned in the sources cited, but not enough (IMO) to confer notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.