Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GLLI Translated YA Book Prize

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|GLLI Translated YA Book Prize}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GLLI_Translated_YA_Book_Prize Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|GLLI Translated YA Book Prize}})

Article about a new literary award, not properly referenced as notable. As always, every literary award on earth is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists -- the notability test is the reception of enough reliable source media coverage about the award to pass WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH. But apart from one post to a publishing industry PR blog, the only other reference here is the award's own self-published content about itself, and there's no evidence of real coverage in real media being shown at all. Bearcat (talk) 20:16, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom, for failing WP:ORGDEPTH. I can't imagine any awards being notable their first year, at best it's WP:TOOSOON. Ifnord (talk) 03:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Per nom. No RS for WP:GNG and a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. Britishfinance (talk) 18:00, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.