Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSV Sleeper Service (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 07:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

=[[:GSV Sleeper Service]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GSV Sleeper Service}}

:{{la|GSV Sleeper Service}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GSV_Sleeper_Service_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|GSV Sleeper Service}})

Fictional spaceship that fails WP:NFICTION/GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. Subject to two old AfDs. How our standards have changed, eh? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Delete — pure fancruft.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete. Fails NFICTION/GNG. Our standards are higher people. Kacper IV (talk) 09:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.