Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabi Scardi

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 03:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

=[[Gabi Scardi]]=

:{{la|Gabi Scardi}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabi Scardi}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Gabi Scardi}})

Non-notable's autobiography. Orange Mike | Talk 19:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

:Weak delete From a google of her name I can find several pages about her, however as from the user's name who created the article and the fact it states "Curriculum Vitae" at the top of the article I would say delete as it is being used for advertisement. I would not oppose a properly cited article about the person however. Miyagawa (talk) 19:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:13, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment The article itself is clearly a self-promotional autobiography, and I think could probably be safely speedied under G11. Given that it is, in addition, an unreferenced BLP, we could safely delete it under our policies. However, the Gnews search [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Gabi+Scardi%22] gives us a fair amount of sourcing, albeit in a foreign language, with the subject being interviewed and referenced as a prominent art critic, so I think underlying notability is there. The closing admin is invited to regard this as a keep !vote if the article is cleaned up and sourced by closing time, or delete otherwise, at the admin's discretion. RayTalk 15:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:15, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.