Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Carrubba

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Gabriel Carrubba]]=

:{{la|Gabriel Carrubba}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gabriel_Carrubba Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Gabriel Carrubba}})

No evidence of notability. Article creator has been making various pages for the purpose of self-promotion for him, his friends/colleagues and their projects. This is yet another example. AussieLegend (✉) 10:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:12, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:12, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Delete does not meet the notability guidelines for actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete as failing both WP:NACTOR and the basic tenets of WP:ANYBIO; he is almost solely covered by [https://www.google.co.uk/search?client=firefox-b&dcr=0&ei=QxpFWoKYNcjRwQLgmaToAQ&q=%22Gabriel+Carrubba%22&oq=%22Gabriel+Carrubba%22&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i30k1.1660.4907.0.5404.2.2.0.0.0.0.69.130.2.2.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.2.129...0i22i30k1.0.dkzu9hljvq4 social media], and completely lacks in-depth and persistent coverage in reliable sources. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 16:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Delete – A non notable individual with no independent coverage. Also looks likely to fail WP:NOTPROMO. Kb.au (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
~~Delete~~ – No significant coverage whatsoever. No newspaper mentions. Does not meet GNG. Kb.au (talk) 02:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.