Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Fairman

:{{la|Gabriel Fairman}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Gabriel Fairman}})

Articles does not establish notability--one ref in alumni magazine is not enough. Appears to be autobiographical. Google search, google books, google scholar, google news reveal little, e.g., a press release. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:PROF. Logical Cowboy (talk) 04:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delete. Notability not attained. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:51, 30 April 2011 (UTC).
• Delete. The detail in the article can be adequately sourced to the alumni mag piece. And if there were multiple articles like that, then there would be a good chance of passing WP:GNG. But the article only lists the one, and I couldn't find any others. A very similar article Gabriel fairman (note capitalization) was deleted via prod in 2008; an archived copy can be seen [http://deletionpedia.dbatley.com/w/index.php?title=Gabriel_fairman_(deleted_27_Mar_2008_at_08:17) here]. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.