Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Schoenfeld (3rd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:22, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Gabriel Schoenfeld]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Schoenfeld}}

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Gabriel Schoenfeld}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Gabriel Schoenfeld}})

Fails to meet GNG. Almost entirely primary-sourced article with just one marginal secondary mention; does not meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:JOURNALIST with few reviews and no significant body of work Cambial foliar❧ 23:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:47, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

  • Comment. 4meter4 didn't provide specifics, so I will. I show one book review in a journal: [https://networks.h-net.org/node/14542/reviews/15032/lanosga-schoenfeld-necessary-secrets-national-security-media-and-rule]. I show one book review in the NYT ([https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/30/books/review/Dershowitz-t.html]) and a set of letters to the editor dunking on one of his columns: [https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/14/opinion/letters/pentagon-papers-daniel-ellsberg.html]. I have another set of letters to the editor from the LA Times ([https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-may-26-le-friday26.2-story.html]) but cannot find actual reviews from editorial or newspaper staff. I cannot find reviews of his WaPo work or columns in said paper, but can find a significant mention of one of those columns in the publication of the World Socialist Web Site: [https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/02/10/sno2-f10.html]. I don't doubt the breadth of his body of work as a columnist, but that's all primary sourcing. Right now, I'm leaning delete owing to lack of significant secondary source coverage; if {{u|4meter4}} could attach the sources they found in their WP:BEFORE, I'd be grateful. Iseult Δx parlez moi 23:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

::{{yo|Iseult}} I also located the two letters to NYT and the book review in the same. I agree your view that it is insufficient – nor close – to meet a level of secondary coverage for WP:AUTHOR. Cambial foliar❧ 17:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

  • Delete per Iseult's analysis of the references. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete. Despite the status of some references, their content does not indicate notability. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 08:52, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.