Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Vicéns

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:05, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[Gabriel Vicéns]]=

:{{la|Gabriel Vicéns}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gabriel_Vic%C3%A9ns Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Gabriel Vicéns}})

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG Flat Out (talk) 00:46, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 22:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Weak keep as I found no outstandingly good coverage aside from All About Jazz and a few others so this may be enough to simply keep for now. SwisterTwister talk 02:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:10, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

:* Wikipedia:WikiProject Jazz notified. AllyD (talk) 06:28, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Weak keep: Parts of Allaboutjazz are promotional [http://musicians.allaboutjazz.com/toolkit.php?&width=1024], so care is needed, but it also runs bylined reviews, which both the subject's albums have received. Although I suspect he is more up-and-coming than established, there is probably enough critical attention in the references. AllyD (talk) 06:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.