Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielle Tuite

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Gabrielle Tuite}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabrielle Tuite}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Gabrielle Tuite}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 00:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Gabrielle Tuite]]=

:{{la|1=Gabrielle Tuite}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Gabrielle Tuite}})

Has had no significant roles in film or television. Fails WP:NACTRESS. No significant coverage in cited sources. I could find nothing but trivial mentions. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and New York. Shellwood (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.