Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gage Daye

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 01:57, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Gage Daye]]=

:{{la|Gage Daye}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gage_Daye Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Gage Daye}})

Does not meet WP:NHOOPS guidelines for notability. Also probably a copyvio, although I am not sure from where. Rusf10 (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 00:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy Festivities! // J 947 ^{^(c)} 01:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Happy Festivities! // J 947 ^{^(c)} 01:19, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Keep - I found multiple independent, reliable references that discuss the topic in detail. {{ping|Rusf10}} Please see [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Gage_Daye&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1 THIS] for copyvio. Interstellarity (talk) 12:10, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
:Where are the sources? Its going to take a lot of them since he doesn't meet the notability guidelines. Unless there are multiple in-depth articles in national sources, I'm going to say that he does not even come close to meeting notability.--Rusf10 (talk) 15:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
::Just clarifying here that meeting GNG while failing NSPORT is a almost certain notability pass and a far better claim to notability than the other way around. Happy Festivities! // J 947 ^{^(c)} 19:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment I considerably cleaned up the article and added several sources. -- Dammit_steve (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Keep Sources help it meet GNG plus looks better thanks to Dammit steve. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 16:07, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.