Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaia Power Technologies

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nja247 12:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Gaia Power Technologies]]=

:{{la|Gaia Power Technologies}} ([{{fullurl:Gaia Power Technologies|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaia Power Technologies}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This brief article reads like an advert. It's two sources do little to provide evidence of notability, if having your company mentioned in a mainstream newspaper equals notability then my local corner shop could have a wikipedia page. magnius (talk) 22:07, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment. How does this read like an advert? It simply says what the company does and where it is based. There's nothing claiming that it's better than its competitors or urging people to buy its products or services. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:CORP, one source is the company founder, so their could be a problem with sources. Vegaswikian (talk) 04:48, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Strong keep There is very substantial coverage of the company in the Crain's article already sourced and many additional sources [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Gaia+Power+Technologies&cf=all]. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Not convince that raising money is notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.