Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganking

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Ganking]]=

:{{la|Ganking}} ([{{fullurl:Ganking|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganking}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Neologism unsupported by independent references: neither notable nor verifiable. It was put up for proposed deletion in mid-2007. It's now 2009, and the article is still unsourced. —C.Fred (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Raven1977 (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete - wholly original research. A web search reveals that the term is certainly in usage, but at present discussion of the subject appears to be limited to blogs, forums and other self-published sources. Fails WP:V, WP:N and WP:NEOLOGISM. Marasmusine (talk) 14:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete - Currently no more than a neologism, and does appear limited to forums as Marasmusine suggested ([http://www2b.abc.net.au/tmb/Client/PrintFriendlyMessage.aspx?b=59&m=4930 such as this one]). No reliable secondary sources that I could find. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:58, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Neutral - I find it rather odd that no sources can be found. I can remember this term being used in RO as early as iRO closed beta, in late 2002). -- Jelly Soup (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.