Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaper- snow

:{{la|Gaper- snow}} ([{{fullurl:Gaper- snow|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaper- snow}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

WP:DICTDEF, goes at wiktionary, not here. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 15:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

:Interesting enough, it was nominated for deletion (PROD) before this for being a NEOLOGISM... ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 15:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete per WP:DICT --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable neologism; not even sure it has a place at wiktionary; seems more like an obscure urbandictionary thing. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Again, non-notable neologism; per WP:NEO and WP:NFT. Probably a made-up term by a few people feeling rouge... Cheers. I'^mperator 17:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

:It doesn't appear to be made up; there are half a dozen definitions at [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gaper Urban Dictionary] that are almost identical to this article. Nevertheless, it is a neologism used among skiers and snowboarders. Therefore, delete. Cnilep (talk) 19:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 17:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Do not transwiki to Wiktionary, they don't want it either. —Angr 20:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, NN, dictionary. —Tamfang (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, as the editor who {{prod}}-ed the article as being a NN Neologism. Toddst1 (talk) 15:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.