Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gargoyle Mechanique

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:19, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Gargoyle Mechanique]]=

:{{la|Gargoyle Mechanique}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Gargoyle Mechanique}})

The level of coverage and significance doesn't pass WP:NOTABILITY threshold. Boleyn (talk) 07:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:24, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Comment my gut when I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gargoyle_Mechanique&type=revision&diff=988202171&oldid=916814918 cleaned this up] was that they're probably notable, but I'm still unable to find sourcing. I'll try again during this AfD as it wasn't on my priority list. Star Mississippi 13:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:14, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coolperson177 (talk) 12:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Bold third relist with the hope of increased participation.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:53, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Delete: While I would like to see increased coverage of the emerging and disappearing networks of art groups, I don't see the coverage to sustain the present article. There's a lack of references regarding the initial project under this name, a lot of rather personal description of the middle period, again lacking evidence of notability. That leaves the final phase of the 1990s art space.: it did get passing mentions in event reviews and a retrospective brief mention in the 2003 piece about another event. I am not seeing evidence of attained notabiility in any of its phases of activity. AllyD (talk) 08:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom and AllyD. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 23:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.