Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GatherSpace

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

=[[GatherSpace]]=

:{{la|GatherSpace}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GatherSpace Stats])

:({{Find sources|GatherSpace}})

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH--does not have in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. There are sources but most are press releases, blogs, or passing mentions. A Google News search did not turn up much more. Promotional article by now-blocked editor. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:47, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:41, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:41, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JayJayWhat did I do? 00:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:05, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Weak delete - four re-lists? I'll bite. As the nominator suggests, many of the sources aren't really reliable sources. Of those that are, some seem to be more focussed on the creator and his "vision" rather than the company itself. I think we would need more in terms of quality "significant coverage" to substantiate WP:CORPDEPTH. [http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/1530-cloud-based-software-requirements-management.html This sort of thing] is good, but [http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Levy_Darren_1404379867.aspx this sort of thing] is basically worthless as a source for conferring notability. Quite a few of the sources seem to have been prompted by one particular announcement which doesn't really suggest "depth" to me - short term quantity over longer term quality. Another one of these, "what's the CORP version of BLP1E?", cases. Stalwart111 03:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Comment - AfDs are not supposed to be relisted more than three times. Somebody needs to make a call. No opinion. Carrite (talk) 23:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

::Good point. With that said, the second relist was only nine hours after the first relist. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - Commercial spam. I would like to document the timeless prose, however: "GatherSpace is a California-based company that provides on-demand tools to manage customer requirements." Sounds like an exceptional enhancement of user-consumer recipient mechanisms. Shit, if you're gonna spam for yourself, at least make it coherent... Carrite (talk) 02:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.