Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gayle Williamson

:{{la|Gayle Williamson}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gayle_Williamson Stats])

:({{Find sources|Gayle Williamson}})

Not notable, not everybody needs a Wikipedia article Shankers56 (talk) 14:19, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 9. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 14:39, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 14:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

• Keep, as per WP:ANYBIO, The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times Miss UK is a pretty significant award. Murry1975 (talk) 20:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep - not everybody needs a Wikipedia article isn't a valid reason for deletion, Per above Miss UK is significant →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 01:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
• Procedural keep as pointed out above, she won a significant award, and that is considered notable. Mabalu (talk) 13:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
• Keep Vandalism-only account nominator, has now been blocked. James^x12345 14:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.