Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gedenken

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete . Beeblebrox (talk) 00:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Gedenken]]=

{{ns:0|I}}

:{{la|Gedenken}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gedenken}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Gedenken}})

Fails the general notability guidelines. Trivial assertions of notability ie. second place in non-notable competition. Other assertions of notability are based on the artist, not the artwork. Reconsider! 12:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

  • This article should stay, as the artists work is notable, as qualified by the high praise it has received by industry critics, incl. Fairfax Media and the Australian Institute of Professional Photography. The work is currently being considered for further exhibitions at the Sydney Jewish Museum for it's use of historical testimonies of holocaust survivors / refugees in Australia. Seanpbrokenshire (talk) 01:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC) — Seanpbrokenshire (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete This one artwork does not appear to be notable enough to rate its own article. It's possible that the artist, Meredith Schofield, might be notable based on this and (presumably) other work, and if this gets deleted, interested parties could try creating an article about her instead. --MelanieN (talk) 01:57, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't really see how this piece is notable on its own. Like MelanieN said, this might be worth mentioning in an article about the artist (assuming that article fulfilled WP:AUTHOR) but not on its own. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 19:54, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.