Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gee-Haw Stables
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Gee-Haw Stables}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gee-Haw Stables}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Gee-Haw Stables}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
=[[:Gee-Haw Stables]]=
:{{la|1=Gee-Haw Stables}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Gee-Haw Stables}})
I found no significant coverage, and the two references are trivial mentions. SL93 (talk) 01:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
:
{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:29, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
:Delete as per nom Mr Vili talk 06:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.