Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geeks in Space (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Geeks in Space]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geeks in Space}}

:{{la|Geeks in Space}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Geeks in Space}})

The previous afd closed with speculation that sources exist but none were forth coming. This was a little webcast that was done with the early Slashdot folk and does not meet WP:N or WP:V. meshach (talk) 18:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Delete Defunct webcast; no notability found. --MelanieN (talk) 15:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete no sources found, and proof that absolutely no one should say "keep but source it better" unless they prove that sources exist. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:26, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

::No one said that in this afd. Let's try to assume that others want to help and let others contribute uninhibited. meshach (talk) 17:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.