Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gender of rearing

:{{la|Gender of rearing}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gender_of_rearing Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Gender of rearing}})

Unsourced WP:DICDEF since 2009. While I suppose there could be an article about this topic, the fact that none has been written in 9 years suggests that the topic is, so far, adequately covered in the articles in the list of transgender-related topics. Delete with no prejudice to recreation as an actual article.  Sandstein  14:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Dysklyver 15:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom and WP:DICDEF if not expanded to a bona fide article, precisely as the nominator suggests. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wiktionary - this reads more like a dictionary definition than an encyclopedia article. It is currently a one-sentence article that merely tells us what the term "gender of rearing" means and does not cite any sources. Vorbee (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

:*Transwiki without sources makes little sense. Wiktionary needs sources too.  Sandstein  18:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete, per Sandstein. I can imagine an encyclopedic article on the topic for sure but with no sources, there's no other conceivable result here. A Train^talk 19:43, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:BEFORE and WP:Deletion is not cleanup. We don't delete WP:Notable topics simply because the article has yet to be expanded and adequately sourced. Also, the topic is not simply about transgender issues. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: I alerted the following WikiProjects to this discussion: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender Studies, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC) ‎

• Comment. "Sex of rearing" is the more commonly used term. Our existing article Sex assignment appears to cover an awkward combination of this subject and surgical assignment. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:01, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
• Redirect to sex assignment; it seems the larger context this is best seen as an aspect of. --Nat Gertler (talk) 04:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
• Redirect to sex assignment; it's kinda a shame because I actually think there's something to be said about this specifically. From what I gather, it's the way a child is raised regardless (although typically inline) with what the child identifies as. I feel this specific topic gets a bit lost in the enormity of the sex assignment article, but until something can be said about it, redirecting seems like the best option. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 21:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
• Delete  Not verifiable by our readers, and verifiability is a core content policy.  As per WP:Deletion guidelines for administrators, "core content policies...are not negotiable, and cannot be superseded by any other guidelines or by editors' consensus."  Unscintillating (talk) 17:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.