Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentle Fund Organization (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Gentle Fund Organization]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentle Fund Organization}}

:{{la|1=Gentle Fund Organization}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Gentle Fund Organization}})

Last AfD was 12 years ago with low participation. This still fails WP:ORG for lack of significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Singapore, and Vietnam. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete: While previous AFD was closed as kept due to sourcing found, the sourcing only proves existence of organisation and still fails GNG. No new sources found. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Delete. This was kept 12 years ago, when our standards for WP:SIGCOV were still evolving, but now it's a clear fail. Bearian (talk) 02:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.