Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeoAccess

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:14, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

=[[:GeoAccess]]=

:{{la|1=GeoAccess}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=GeoAccess}})

Tagged for notability since 2010. Doesn't seem to have enough WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Business, Companies, Computing, United States of America, and Kansas. UtherSRG (talk) 17:23, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete - Not too much coverage, the best one is the Inc profile, but there is just not enough here. Royal88888 (talk) 08:25, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete - Nothing that meets ORGCRIT. Would suggest a redirect to UnitedHealth Group which purchased it in 2002. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.