Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Hill Chef

=[[George Hill Chef]]=

:{{la|George Hill Chef}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|George Hill Chef}})

Article is an unsourced autobiography. Seduisant (talk) 23:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

: Author's other two autobiographies were speedy deletes on 8 June 2011. --Seduisant (talk) 00:54, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete - I see lots of mentions of him. See [http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=ATRVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=FJUDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4092,2372940&dq=george-hill+chef&hl=en], [http://www.hospitalitymagazine.com.au/Article.aspx?ArticleID=234585], [http://www.hospitalitymagazine.com.au/article/Grand-Hyatt-chef-named-Apprentice-of-the-Year/530460.aspx], [http://www.hospitalitymagazine.com.au/article/Lanzafame-wins-inaugural-chef-comp/234613.aspx], [http://www.hospitalitymagazine.com.au/article/Lascelles-to-defend-title-at-Chef-of-Year-competition/528969.aspx]. These are almost all simply mentioning him as head judge at a cooking competition as reported in the same Australian hospitality magazine. This is insufficient to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. Article looks like something a speakers' bureau might send out. Even if true, none of the claims made suggest that the subject is notable, save his being webmaster/owner of four "extremely popular websites". Alexa disagrees on this point, however, with rankings of 6,346,650; 11,275,689; unranked; and unranked. Fails WP:GNG. If substantial coverage from WP:RS sources can be found, happy to look again. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 11:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.