Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geosexing

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 04:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Geosexing]]=

:{{la|Geosexing}} ([{{fullurl:Geosexing|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geosexing}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Neologism without widespread use; coined by (according to article) "an employee at a small company" and without a clear conception or publication. Failed PROD, only given rationale for keeping was that geocaching and geoshagging exist. Author has noted that the term/activity is "bound to be conceptualized" and that current reliable/verifiable sources cannot be found. Fribbulus Xax (talk) 12:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete WP:MADEUP. Drawn Some (talk) 14:11, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete, ditto and ditto. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete unencyclopedic. In the government (talk) 15:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. WP:NEO. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Per same reasons as DS. MobileSnail 15:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.