Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Butler

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Overall consensus is that he meets LAWYER & GNG & As the nom hasn't objected to any of the replies I'm wrapping it up as Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

=[[Gerald Butler]]=

:{{la|Gerald Butler}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gerald_Butler Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Gerald Butler}})

I don't believe Circuit judges in England and Wales are de facto notable individuals. There are over 600 of these and they rank below high court judges. All of my recent AFD nominations of English and Welsh Circuit judges have reached a consensus to delete, but of course each AFD should still be judged independently. Uhooep (talk) 09:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:41, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Keep Notable judge. Andrew D. (talk) 17:56, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Queen's Counsel, and according to WP:LAWYERS "A lawyer who has received an appointment that indicates pre-eminence within the profession, such as Queen's Counsel or serjeant at law or senior counsel, shall be treated in the same manner as a person who satisfies criteria 1 of WP:ANYBIO (which relates to significant and well known awards or honours)".DuncanHill (talk) 01:39, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

::Additional obituary in The Times, in itself a good claim to notability. And in the Telegraph. Obits in two major national newspapers argues extremely strongly for notability. DuncanHill (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Keep: As DuncanHill points out, WP:LAWYERS cites QC as notable. Sounds like you're clearing out some other underbrush, though, keep it up! Chris vLS (talk) 06:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.