Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerard Blaize

:{{la|Gerard Blaize}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gerard_Blaize Stats])

:({{Find sources|Gerard Blaize}})

Non notable martial artist. Article's only source is not independent and my search found no significant independent reliable coverage. Also found nothing that supports a claim he meets WP:MANOTE. Jakejr (talk) 13:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 13:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 13:31, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 13:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AlanS (talk) 13:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

• Delete as per nomination. AlanS (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
• Weak keep AlanS PROD'd the article but this was declined because the entries under Media covered the references. I agree with that. It remains weak because I believe there should be more references in the article. High rank itself does not make one notable but being the first non-Japanese 7th Dan in Aikido would. Now I will admit to being a bit soft on Aikido so take my opinion as you would.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

::I added three further references but they are not inline.Peter Rehse (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

• Comment I would like to see some good independent coverage from a source different than the Aikido Journal. It would also help if the claim of being the first non-Japanese 7th dan was documented. Papaursa (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
• Weak delete Article lacks enough good sources and the only claim of notability (first non-Japanese 7th dan) has no support.Mdtemp (talk) 14:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
• Weak Delete Being interviewed in the Aikido Journal and a brief listing giving his rank are not enough to convince me he meets WP:MANOTE or WP:GNG. Most promising claim of notability is not supported. I have no objection to this article being userfied and brought back when a better case for notability can be made. Papaursa (talk) 16:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.