Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerbarus Fleccius
=[[Gerbarus Fleccius]]=
:{{la|Gerbarus Fleccius}} – (
:({{Find sources|Gerbarus Fleccius}})
The picture shown is by Gerlach Flicke, as per that article and the National Portrait Gallery. There are no accessible sources cited, and a search around (Google Books, Google Scholar, JSTOR, etc) reveals nothing. I assume this is some kind of mistake; in any case, it should be deleted. J Milburn (talk) 01:22, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:30, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Redirect to Gerlach Flicke; it's his Latin name. As a side note, you mention "no accessible sources," but the DNB was already cited at the time you nominated it. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- This being an obvious merge, the discussion should be closed. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:55, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Merge This article has a picture, source and small bit of info (i.e. Latin name he was also known by) so should be a merge to longer article rather than straight redirect. Definitely not a deletion candidate. Boleyn (talk) 08:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- Merge per others.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:09, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.