Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gertrude Sheldon Sands Whitney

{{ns:0|B}}

:{{la|Gertrude Sheldon Sands Whitney}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Gertrude Sheldon Sands Whitney}})

No significant coverage to show her notability. There are multiple reliable sources, but none of them even come close to giving coverage that would count as anything but trivial. They are nothing more than one sentence mentions in articles about her spouses or just run of the mill wedding announcements. Her spouses may potentially be notable, but we all know that notability is not inherited automatically by marriage. Yaksar (let's chat) 23:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

• Delete. [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Gertrude+Sheldon+Whitney%22&btnG=Search+Archives&scoring=a Some news articles that Whitney was a witness in a court case against her husband, Richard Whitney]. But being a witness in a court case is not notable. Also, agree with Yaksar-- even if Mr. Whitney is notable, she is not inherently notable by proxy. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 23:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
• Delete not enough coverage of her to pass WP:GNG. Mtking (talk) 01:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
• Delete Sources with significant coverage are not present, notability has not been established. - SudoGhost™ 01:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable person. Sources exist but do not assert notability.--EdwardZhao (talk) 17:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.