Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghatal Rabindra Satabarsiki Mahavidyalaya
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Ghatal Rabindra Satabarsiki Mahavidyalaya]]=
:{{la|1=Ghatal Rabindra Satabarsiki Mahavidyalaya}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Ghatal Rabindra Satabarsiki Mahavidyalaya}})
No evidence of notability - seems like one of the thousands of local colleges in India which does not satisfy WP:NSCHOOL or WP:GNG. Doing WP:BEFORE I found some mentions of the college in books and catalogues (such as the [https://books.google.co.il/books?id=gJGgAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Ghatal+Rabindra+Satabarsiki+Mahavidyalaya%22 1964 New Educational Directory of the World]) but no in-depth coverage. Muhandes (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and West Bengal. Muhandes (talk) 16:38, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as it fails NSCHOOL. VV 08:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Here the concern is the notability of an academic institution. For an academic institution or academic scholar, the most reliable search is Google Scholar. In the Wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Before_nominating:_checks_and_alternatives, it is written that:
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
Where possible, also please make use of The Wikipedia Library, which offers free access to various subscription databases of additional resources. Not every resource available in that collection will always be relevant in every situation, so it is not necessary to exhaustively check every database, but there are many resources that may be useful for specialized or older topics that might not Google well.
If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an AfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted.
If you spend more time examining the sources and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an AfD nomination may still be appropriate.
If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, using the advice in Wikipedia:Citing sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern.
Here, the search on Google Scholar shows many research articles published by the faculties of this college. Please see:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=0&q=Ghatal+Rabindra+Satabarsiki+Mahavidyalaya&hl=en&as_sdt=0,22
https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?hl=en&view_op=search_authors&mauthors=Ghatal+Rabindra+Satabarsiki+Mahavidyalaya&btnG=
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sebak-Jana/publication/314181461_Efficiency_Analysis_of_Higher_Education_Institutes_A_Study_on_Colleges_under_Vidyasagar_University_in_West_Bengal_India/links/58bb074b92851c471d531591/Efficiency-Analysis-of-Higher-Education-Institutes-A-Study-on-Colleges-under-Vidyasagar-University-in-West-Bengal-India.pdf
In summary, this college satisfies the notability criteria. User:Soumitrahazra
:: None of these sources show significant coverage of the college. --Muhandes (talk) 16:44, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NSCHOOL. NMasiha (talk) 12:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No indication of notability. Fails WP:NSCHOOL Imperfect Boy (talk) 04:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect to Vidyasagar University as a WP:ATD. There's no question that sources verify it exists, but struggling to find significant independant coverage to show it's notable under WP:GNG or WP:ORG. However as it's undergraduate, I'm assuming it's degree awarding, so might be notable under WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES#2 if there's offline sources, but it's not independant as it's part of Vidyasagar University. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
:*"Affiliated to" is different from "part of". Phil Bridger (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.