Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostock

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 23:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Ghostock]]=

:{{la|Ghostock}} ([{{fullurl:Ghostock|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostock}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Pretty sure that this particular annual convention has not garnered the attention required for a Wikipedia article. Let it gain the fame and notoriety necessary so that third-party independent sources have reported on it and then it can have an article. Do we have a WP:CONVENTIONS notability guideline? We should. ScienceApologist (talk) 16:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete, completely non-notable per WP:GNG. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete does not assert notability.Synchronism (talk) 20:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.