Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gi (kana)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ki (kana). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:45, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

=[[:Gi (kana)]]=

:{{la|1=Gi (kana)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Gi (kana)}})

Article content superfluous to the much better developed Ki (kana). Van Isaac, MPLL^cont_WpWS 02:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages - substantively the same content, with similar well-developed alternate articles:

:{{la|Ga (kana)}}

Article content superfluous to the much better developed Ka (kana). Van Isaac, MPLL^cont_WpWS 02:15, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Van Isaac, MPLL^cont_WpWS 02:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Van Isaac, MPLL^cont_WpWS 02:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Redirect to Ka (kana) and Ki (kana), consistent with Gu (kana), Ge (kana), Go (kana), Za (kana), etc. Adumbrativus (talk) 08:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Redirect both per nominator. There is no reason to have these articles if the only thing to say about them is "ki/ka with a dakuten". I've already taken the liberty of merging the only substantive sentence in Ga (kana) into Ka (kana). Mlb96 (talk) 19:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.