Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilland Jones

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 19:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Gilland Jones]]=

:{{la|Gilland Jones}} ([{{fullurl:Gilland Jones|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilland Jones}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Deleted PROD that stated "Minor actor, fails WP:ENT" NrDg 16:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete nearly a speedy, as I don't think the article is even claiming the subject is notable.--Talain (talk) 17:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

:A good-faith claim, albeit weak, was there so I do not see it as being speedy eligible. --NrDg 17:45, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

:Well, hence the 'nearly' ;)--Talain (talk) 18:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

:: - I saw that, just justifying my decline of the original speedy request. --NrDg 18:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Weak Delete Jones is very young and has a recur credit on a populated kids' show. Her character has a significant part on the kid cult show. Though this is very early on in her career, someone will create the article again later. Her bio and ref could be written stronger with more information that is avail on reliable sources. BioDetective2508 (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2009
Delete without prejudice. The actress has had a very short career [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2678236/], and is not yet in any Google News search [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=2000&as_user_hdate=2009&q=%22Gilland+Jones+%22&scoring=a&hl=en&ned=us&um=1&q=%22Gilland+Jones+%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go], though she is starting to hit the varius sites in a regular Google search [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Gilland+Jones%22&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g7]. She'll be back... but the article is as yet premature. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.