Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gimlet (Transformers)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

=[[Gimlet (Transformers)]]=

:{{la|Gimlet (Transformers)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gimlet (Transformers)}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Gimlet (Transformers)}})

Low-quality non-notable minor fictional character stub. Almost entirely in-universe, and is sourced to a fan site and a YouTube clip. Character fails WP:GNG categorically. — Chromancer talk/cont 02:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

::Can't use illegal WP:YOUTUBE videos third person evidence, delete this nonsense. Dwanyewest (talk) 04:46, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete, no evidence of real-world notability, no reliable sources cited. J Milburn (talk) 09:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Merge to Beast Wars Second Mathewignash (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:GNG - no coverage in reliable independent sources. Blest Withouten Match (talk) 17:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete, no reliable sources to assert notability. Tarc (talk) 15:17, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Merge into List of Beast Wars Second characters along with other characters form the same series. —Farix (t | c) 00:03, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • When dealing with non-notable character articles, it is always preferable to look for a list or to create one to merge the article into, or merge/redirect them to the main article instead of outright deletion and is in keeping with the WP:PRESERVE policy. Only in cases where the character is completely incidental should it be deleted. —Farix (t | c) 18:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete again, no verifiable information to merge. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:10, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete- no reliable sources, no convincing assertion of notability, and all the material is excessive in-universe fan trivia which is not suitable to be merged anywhere. Reyk YO! 07:28, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nonsense, nonsense, nonsense. Pokemon anyone? Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 01:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.