Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Marie May (2nd nomination)

{{ns:0|b}}

:{{la|Gina Marie May}} ([{{fullurl:Gina Marie May|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Marie May (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Notability not established through reliable sources. IMDb doesn't show any notable roles. Wizardman 21:45, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

• Delete.

{{cquote|

• Significant coverage means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive. [FAILED]
• Reliable means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability. [FAILED]
• Sources, defined on Wikipedia as secondary sources, provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally preferred. [FAILED]}} A Prodigy ~In Pursuit of Perfection~ 22:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per the same rationale as A Prodigy. Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.