Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gisa Adler

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:51, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

=[[Gisa Adler]]=

:{{la|Gisa Adler}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gisa_Adler Stats])

:({{Find sources|Gisa Adler}})

Entirely unreferenced. No evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 20:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Delete. Non-notable individual. The only sources returned by Google are passing mentions on genealogy websites. Nothing significant found from independent reliable sources. Philg88 ^♦talk 03:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 June 16. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 20:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Delete Doesn't pass GNG. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 15:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete. WP:GNG fails and the only reference isn't notable. $AHLM13$ talk 11:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Weak delete she is mentioned in a couple of books, albeit in passing, which is more than most music teachers get. --Bejnar (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Delete. Article is a nice effort by a former student, but fails WP:GNG and all listed categories, alas.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 14:28, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.