Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giulio Castagnoli

=[[Giulio Castagnoli]]=

:{{la|Giulio Castagnoli}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Giulio Castagnoli}})

Unreferenced BLP since April 2010. Although there are assertions of notability in the article, it completely fails WP:V All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 23:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

  • Keep - A search on Google has provided news coverage in italian newspaper, mention of his works in several italian and international sites and many entries in Google/Amazon books both as author and in books from other authors. This article deserves a chance to be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpaa (talkcontribs) 19:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 February 2011 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

  • Weak keep – The lack of citations is problematic in a BLP, but the article appears to be salvageable: there are many examples of coverage like [http://www.ilmonferrato.it/articolo_cultura.php?ARTICLE=8226fca5fa0a60ded1fe9f43339f7589 this], but my poor Italian skills prevent me from doing a good assessment of the reliability of the sources. I also found a brief mention of him in an article in The Musical Times (Vol. 139, Iss. 1864; pg. 72, 2 pgs; autumn 1998). Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 05:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep The published works are sufficient to show notability. i am inclined to defer to the consensus of national language WP editors on topics like this, especially when confirmed by the de and fr WPs, whose standards for notability are in general considerably higher than ours. DGG ( talk ) 02:28, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.