Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gladys Reyes

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[Gladys Reyes]]=

:{{la|Gladys Reyes}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gladys_Reyes Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Gladys Reyes}})

Delete: as non-notable entertainer. Quis separabit? 00:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Keep - Has enough major roles to pass WP:ENTERTAINER. Also, did you even check for sources before nominating the article for deletion? She's been covered in a lot of websites, as well as entertainment magazines. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep - Definitely notable. Nominator has the burden of proving non-notability which was not done. —seav (talk) 00:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep easily passes WP:ENTERTAINER --Lenticel ^(talk) 14:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.