Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Llopis

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Soft delete. Has been listed for almost a month with no feedback, treat this as equivalent to an expired WP:Proposed deletion. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Glenn Llopis]]=

:{{la|Glenn Llopis}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Glenn_Llopis Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Glenn Llopis}})

A person purporting to be connected with the subject of this article, {{u|JimmyDonuts}}, made a GF attempt to edit and update it to bring it into compliance with BLP. He disclosed his COI at the Teahouse and, there, also indicated that if we couldn't get it up to a level of BLP acceptability, he - and the subject - would be keen to see it deleted. While the subject has been copiously quoted in WP:RS, coverage of the subject is - literally - just quotes. None of the biographical information contained in the BLP can be sourced to RS. If we remove unsourced or improperly sourced material we will be left with a BLP that simply acknowledges the individual is a living human who has been quoted in a number of media outlets and works as a motivational speaker. I feel like this is a person who probably will, in the near future, merit an article but at the present time the coverage doesn't meet the standard of substantial to pass GNG and we have a total lack of RS that would allow inclusion of even the basic information customary to a biography. I would suggest this be deleted with no prejudice for its future recreation. DarjeelingTea (talk) 03:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note - For ease of processing this AfD I've gone ahead and removed the aforementiond unsourced (and one instance of improperly sourced) content from the article. DarjeelingTea (talk) 03:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.