Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global storm activity of mid 2010

:{{la|Global storm activity of mid 2010}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Global storm activity of mid 2010}})

These 'Global storm activities' articles are well-sourced, however, this article has events in it that aren't even major and also some well-noticed spelling mistakes that haven't even been spotted.

• For example, the May 10 section is almost completely copied from the 2010 South China floods article.
• "The deceased people were: Aligayib Aliyev and his wife, Gulbaji Aliyeva." doesn't even need to be there.
• "In the southern Serbia, two people, Vukosava Stamenkovic and her husband and Radovan Zlatkovic, from the town of Trgoviste drowned in the flooded the Pcinja River." same with this.
• "On May 17, one people died in the Hungarian town of Miskolc" Major spelling mistake.
• The May 18-June 1 section has been copied from the 2010 Central European floods.
• "A large dust storm swept across both Libya and Egypt on May 26" Now that is something that happens like every few months.
• "The Miami based National Hurricane Centre issued an advisory that the storm had strengthened, with maximum sustained winds of 45 miles per hour (75 km/h) or more during the next 48 hours" wow, an advisory!
• "On May 30, light thunder storms hit parts of Oxfordshire and Buckinghamshire as temperatures begin to rise in Southern England and Greater London." That happens every summer, temperatures rise.
• And look! The May 18-June 1 section makes a second appearance in the article!

Now obviously I am not going to publish every bad thing in the article because this page would be thousands of bytes long.

Bruvtakesover (T|C) 22:05, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

• Keep AFD is not cleanup. You can go fix them yourself if you find factual errors or unnecessary content. As nominator states, it is "well-sourced". A412 (Talk • C) 22:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
• Yes, I'll spend over a year fixing these problems. Bruvtakesover
• Indeed you may. If every article in need of cleanup was deleted, there would likely be only several thousand articles remaining. This is what editing is for. A412 (Talk • C) 20:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

(T|C) 16:19, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

• Keep I agree with A412 the stuff you mentioned could easily be removed since your so good at pointing them out. I think this just needs some devouted users to fix it up JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.