Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloria Brame

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. v/r - TP 14:18, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[Gloria Brame]]=

:{{la|Gloria Brame}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Gloria Brame}})

This is a BLP with no sources at all. It has been tagged as unsourced for 18 months. The only references provided are the subject's own books. There is no evidence of the subject's notability. Alarics (talk) 09:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Week Keep and try improve to BLP citation standards. "There is no evidence" of her notability? Clearly, the question isn't whether she's notable. She is. It's whether she clears the bar for WP notability guidelines, for whatever categories she's in. There's a Forbes article quoting her quite a lot[http://www.forbes.com/2005/06/02/cx_sr_0602bizbasics.html], you have half a dozen mentions in a Washington Post article[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A41587-2004Jun14], and about half an article about her in the Globe and Mail[http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/on-campus-sex-ban-hands-off-the-student-body-prof/article1528269/], perhaps some more coverage in a couple dozen pay-view articles. Numerous mentions in books. The question is: Does it add up? Yakushima (talk) 12:18, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep and add sources. There's enough for our BLP notability standards, but they have to be referenced in the article. Owen× ☎ 14:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Keep I added a bunch of refs, could add more. Is good? Ketzl talk 3:57, 6 August 2011 (EDT)

:*Is very good. Well done, Ketzl. Owen× ☎ 15:28, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.