Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Wobbly terms

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Merging can be addressed through normal channels as Chris Troutman proposes. postdlf (talk) 18:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

=[[Glossary of Wobbly terms]]=

:{{la|Glossary of Wobbly terms}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Glossary_of_Wobbly_terms Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Glossary of Wobbly terms}})

WP should not be a dictionary or glossary, although of course other stuff exists. Although I am confident that many IWW members did use these expressions there is no evidence given that they are specific to this one group and in most cases did not originate with them. "No original research" seems to apply. Borock (talk) 15:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

::Correction: Since the IWW still exists (although more notable historically) there are probably still members saying some of these things. Borock (talk) 22:59, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Merge to Industrial Workers of the World#Lingo WP:STAND and MOS:GLOSSARIES allow glossary lists like this. Much of this is fancruft, written by an IWW member. This list needs to be cut down to linked and cited terms and most of this content should be on Wiktionary. I cannot !vote keep lest this article remain in poor shape. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:38, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.