Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glurple

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. 16:44, 26 June 2009 UninvitedCompany (talk | contribs) deleted "Glurple" ‎ (G1: Patent nonsense, meaningless, or incomprehensible) (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Glurple]]=

:{{la|Glurple}} ([{{fullurl:Glurple|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glurple}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Dictdef, at best. Looks like hoax. Outside scope. Durova^Charge! 18:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete I wish this could be speedied. — Jake Wartenberg 18:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
speedy delete It is a dictionary definition, running afoul of WP:DICDEF, as well as failing WP:N. It also fails verifiability. The claimed German cognate "Dassanaugeshraub" comes back in a Google search only to this article. Speedy delete as category G1, patent nonsense. Edison (talk) 19:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.