Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GodzHell

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:53, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[GodzHell]]=

:{{la|GodzHell}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GodzHell}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|GodzHell}})

Game of questionable notability. Previously deleted under GodzHell.com. Only provided source is a press release from the site - no independent or verifiable third-party sources provided. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 20:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete Game is not notable, and sources are not independent of subject. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 21:18, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. {{#ifeq:|no||([http://www.google.com/cse?cx=009782238053898643791:8naerdbd-oy&q={{urlencode:GodzHell}} Search video game sources])}} • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete as per my reasons for an earlier (declined) CSD. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 03:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete - game has not received significant coverage from reliable publications. Marasmusine (talk) 13:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete no significant coverage listed in article, none found in Google search. Apparently not notable yet. DES ^(talk) 15:57, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.