Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Going akka

:{{la|Going akka}} ([{{fullurl:Going akka|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Going akka}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Unsourced article about an alleged WP:NEOLOGISM. From the dismal Google hits for this phrase I'd almost wonder if this isn't some hoax an individual thought up and is trying to create by posting it here and there. If it's not a hoax it fails notability standards by a very wide margin. DreamGuy (talk) 23:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

• Delete. WP:NEO Niteshift36 (talk) 04:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete As per nom and WP:NEO. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - neologisms do not belong on Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Thryduulf (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as a neologism. Also lacks notability - I find no mainstream media coverage, and no Google hits for "going akka" with either cocodamol or Alan Rickman. Cnilep (talk) 15:51, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as horribly written, delete as either reporting literally and humorlessly on clearly tongue-in-cheek statements (see last paragraph, "his frustrations often resulting in . . . smashing antique chefs outside clubs, pubs and restaurants to pieces") or simply making completely false statements about living people, delete as OR, delete as completely non-notable neologism, and, finally, delete as using asterisks as letters of the word "fucking". Badger Drink (talk) 04:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.