Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goosebumps SlappyWorld

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Goosebumps SlappyWorld]]=

:{{la|Goosebumps SlappyWorld}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Goosebumps_SlappyWorld Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Goosebumps SlappyWorld}})

Fails WP:NBOOK. The article makes no indication why this line of books is notable. It is by a notable author, but notability is not inherited. The two references (both to Amazon) serve only to verify that the book titles exist. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:11, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Weak Keep Provided appropriate sources can be utilized to establish notability. R.L. Stein is nobody to sneeze at.TH1980 (talk) 02:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Weak keep – Reviewed in Publishers Weekly and School Library Journal. I've added citations. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.