Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GrandPrix+

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 03:28, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

=[[GrandPrix+]]=

:{{la|GrandPrix+}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GrandPrix%2B Stats])

:({{Find sources|GrandPrix+}})

The article does not pass the notability criteria for an online magazine and is written purely as an advert. It also appears to be self-published by one of it's authors, failing WP:COI. QueenCake (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Delete per nom. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 21:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Delete. It's only an e-magazine with no real notability. WP:GNG Ducknish (talk) 22:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Delete - appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:WEB as I can find no coverage in reliable sources. Gong show 08:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Delete Per nom. WP:ADVERT at best DavidTTTaylor (talk) 18:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.