Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Tkachuk (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mr.Z-man 22:23, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

=[[Grant Tkachuk]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Tkachuk}}

:{{la|Grant Tkachuk}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Grant_Tkachuk_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Grant Tkachuk}})

Ninth round draft pick who never played in the NHL and only played 64 games in the AHL. Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Tchaliburton (talk) 09:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete: "Non-notable hockey player, fails WP:NHOCKEY, no evidence he passes the GNG. One of a long string of NN stubs thrown up by article creator, without apparent attempt to provide sources attesting to notability, as BLP articles require." That's what I said in January, when I AfDed it. No surprise that Dolovis defied that and just went ahead and recreated it. Ravenswing 16:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete per the first AfD. Ivanvector (talk) 20:12, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep He was a first team all star in the WHL which meets WP:NHOCKEY #4. -DJSasso (talk) 18:07, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

::That's true. I would support keeping the article in light of this. T.C.Haliburton^{talk nerdy to me} 19:35, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Keep per Djsasso. --Hockeyben ^{(talk -} ^contribs) 14:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep in light of DJSasso's comment. Ivanvector (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.