Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gratian Dimech

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

=[[Gratian Dimech]]=

:{{la|Gratian Dimech}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gratian_Dimech Stats])

:({{Find sources|Gratian Dimech}})

This is a technical nomination. The article predates the BLPPROD process, but would, if created today, be subject to it. The gentleman may or may not be notable, but there is neither an assertion of notability nor is there a single WP:RS reference. I am suggesting deletion unless and until it referenced in RS, when it may be speedily closed unless other rationale is given for deletion. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete - I couldn't find any sources to support notability. As well as a basic Google search, I looked in GBooks (one passing mention in an autobiographical work), GNews (nothing), a UK newspaper archive (nothing), the UK Web Archive (nothing), HighBeam (nothing), Gale Cengage Learning (nothing)... Moswento talky 08:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete No evidence of meeting :WP:CREATIVE. AllyD (talk) 18:19, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete. I could find no sources to support the notability of the subject or of the feature film mentioned in the article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. — Joaquin008 (talk) 20:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

:*I fear that isn't really valid. As nominator I am simply pointing out that without a reference in WP:RS this article may not stay. I have made no other comment, and done so with care. There are several people whose opinions here could be agreed with, but I doubt mine is one if them. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.