Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Great South Bay Giant Horseshoe Crab
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 14:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
=[[:Great South Bay Giant Horseshoe Crab]]=
:{{la|1=Great South Bay Giant Horseshoe Crab}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Great South Bay Giant Horseshoe Crab}})
Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline.
Article is about an internet rumor. The only reference relevant to the rumor is the original April Fools article that [supposedly] kicked off the rumor. AFAICT, there are no reliable sources that cover the rumor. — hike395 (talk) 14:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. — hike395 (talk) 14:44, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Sources 2,3 and 4 aren't about this meme thing, I wouldn't consider the rest notable enough. This could be a small few sentences in an article about the town/area maybe. I don't see enough for a full article here. Oaktree b (talk) 15:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
::Fwiw, Great South Bay, Fire Island, and Fire Island National Seashore already exist. — hike395 (talk) 16:32, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and New York. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:18, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
:*Delete: I wish there was any WP:SIGCOV but the only source that mentions the Great South Bay Giant Horseshoe Crab at all is the WP:PRIMARY April Fool's Day prank article from this year. A search for other sources yielded nothing. Vegantics (talk) 18:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
:I would argue that this is already enough for a full article. It is a wonderful piece of local lore that meets notability guideline. We should add back the notice asking people to improve the article by adding more sources rather than deleting it. AmericanTruth (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete the article even makes a show about about how a single mention from a single small town newpaper is what the claim to "notability" is here. That is insufficient for GNG. Iljhgtn (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.